Thank you for such a timely reminder just as is written in proverbs 15:1 “A gentle answer turns away wrath” . I was especially drawn to your gentleness as you defend and explain yourself.

John Lennox correctly addresses that debate often excludes logic for the sake of winning.  I’m fully guilty of arguing points that I know are incorrect because I’m aware that the other side may not be aware of why it’s not true.  The desire to win (whether to appear intelligent, be accepted, save pride, get your way, etc.) is so very powerful that I often fall into this trap.  It takes a lot of nerve to back down and take your medicine when wrong. 

Well said, Mr. Lennox.

Argumentation, although I prefer to use the word debate, is actually to let ideas clash and for some sort of consensus to be formed through reason. It isn’t to “defend the faith”. Yes, it is the position of the debater to defend their ideas, but not defend “the faith”. Should the position become indefensible in the face of logic and reason, then it should compel the loser to change their ideas. This may not be what happens in practice, but it is the reason for debate. And yes, it is a purely intellectual exercise.

Argumentation, on the other hand is emotionally driven and something that is certainly not an intellectual game.

I’m not sure if your title is deriding “Intellectuals” or “Games” but both are worthy of praise. Less can be said for argumentation, which it seems is what you often find yourself engaged in, rather than debate.

I believe Paul expressed it best by his actions. He would do anything even if it meant his own damnation to get you into heaven.

“More subtle forces” than rational argument? Attitudes often speak louder than our reason abilities, especially in a postmodern culture.
Thanks for this warm and well-reasoned “argument.”

I agree, thanks for the reminder, I ought to be peaceful hearted in attitude to a challenge of belief and also disarming in word. My humility can be His Glory.