Dr Lennox places God squarely as the essential source from which all communication and science must occupy,while scientism posits an erratic highly questionable evolving of life, not to mention complex consciousness.
Despite all the bad in life, we see some good. and this is far more encouraging than the dubious emptiness of souless evolution.

Dr Lennox is clearly a force to be reckoned with. It is good to see a scientist who hasn’t been sucked into the new atheist trap standing up for what he believes in. Hopefully he will encourage other scientists to stand up too.

Thank you sir…

I must confess I’m not sure where the Washington Post fits into the spectrum of politics in American media, but judging from the harsh and frankly ridiculous comments posted underneath Dr Lennox’s article I can only assume it’s the American version of ‘Comment is Free’ in the Guardian!

I think Dr L’s style in this article is like usual, a lightweight style with a heavyweight punch and I value his contribution muchly. As for the debate with Dawkins, well even Dawkin’s mum agrees her boy took a beating, so not sure which debate the commentators were watching, but it wasn’t the one I saw.

Nice article.. thank you.

James Pennington